Monday, February 4, 2013

The U.N's Climate Policy Comes to a Screeching Halt!


For more than three years since hackers broke into the computers at the University of East Anglia's Climate Research Unit  the worlds climate scientists have debated pro and con about whether global warming is really a man-caused phenomena. Now comes a game changing leak from www.stopgreensuicide.com that blows the top off the debate maybe once and for all. 

But you have to go deeper into the real story and see the players. Businessmen and politicians brought together by the fury of desire to control everything connected to energy, money and mankind set up Carbon Exchanges in Chicago. Barack Obama was on the board of Directors of that exchange and many more famous and infamous names of individuals and foundations are connected to that scandalous plan. But it started about a decade ago in Europe and involves the likes of George Soros and Al Gore among many other ultra wealthy control freaks.

From an article
Existing Cap-and-Trade Programs to Cut Global Warming Emissions that describes the process...
California is the largest entity in this RGGI scheme. That should tell you something about the already dismal prospects of any real viability of survival for that state.

Cap and Trade is the process used to 'exchange' carbon credits (literally air) for money under the auspices of some arbitrary group of countries, businesses foundations, or politicians. You pay for the right to pollute the air. The more you pollute the more you pay. Its not about stopping pollution its about conditioning society to use less energy so you don't cause as much pollution.  But that's the question; how much is mankind responsible for global warming or is it solar activity that causes the warming and cooling?

That is why the Obama administration is so anxious to have carbon dioxide declared a pollutant. For every breath a human exhales he theoretically could be charged a tax for his carbon dioxide emmission. Yep!, a tax just to breath.  

You can bet if global warming is a device of forced control then the Cap and Trade entities are are nothing more than onerous taxing agencies. And CCX, even though it still operates in Chicago at a greatly diminished capacity, will come to an abrupt end if the Shorebank/Barack Obama/Kamala Harris/Tony West/Diane Fienstien connection is truly exposed. It encompasses the tattered money laundering scandals of the Obama Campaign Finance of foreign cash in California...but that's another story... 

Tuesday, November 20, 2012

OKLAHOMA CITY (BP) -- A federal judge has ruled that Hobby Lobby and Mardel stores must cover abortion-causing drugs for their employees as required by the Obama administration because the companies -- despite having faith as a central element of their operations -- are not religious enough to warrant a court intervention.

Represented by the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, Hobby Lobby and Mardel had argued that requiring them to pay for the drugs, which come under brand names such as Plan B and ella, would violate the faith of their owners, not to mention the U.S. Constitution's guarantee of freedom of religion. Judge Joe Heaton, 
 

A Message from my friend Paul Ls
6 hours ago near Udall, KS ·
A Letter from Hobby Lobby Stores CEO

By David Green, the founder and CEO of Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.

When my family and I started our company 40 years ago, we were working out of a garage on a $600 bank loan, assembling miniature picture frames. Our first retail store wasn't much bigger than most people's living rooms, but we had faith that we would succeed if we lived and worked according to God's word. From there,Hobby Lobby has become one of the nation's largest arts and crafts retailers, with more than 500 locations in 41 states. Our children grew up into fine business leaders, and today we run Hobby Lobby together, as a family.

We're Christians, and we run our business on Christian principles. I've always said that the first two goals of our business are (1) to run our business in harmony with God's laws, and (2) to focus on people more than money. And that's what we've tried to do. We close early so our employees can see their families at night. We keep our stores closed on Sundays, one of the week's biggest shopping days, so that our workers and their families can enjoy a day of rest. We believe that it is by God's grace that Hobby Lobby has endured, and he has blessed us and our employees. We've not only added jobs in a weak economy, we've raised wages for the past four years in a row. Our full-time employees start at 80% above minimum wage.


But now, our government threatens to change all of that. A new government health care mandate says that our family business MUST provide what I believe are abortion-causing drugs as part of our health insurance. Being Christians, we don't pay for drugs that might cause abortions, which means that we don't cover emergency contraception, the morning-after pill or the week-after pill. We believe doing so might end a life after the moment of conception, something that is contrary to our most important beliefs. It goes against the Biblical principles on which we have run this company since day one. If we refuse to comply, we could face $1.3 million PER DAY in government fines.


Our government threatens to fine job creators in a bad economy. Our government threatens to fine a company that's raised wages four years running. Our government threatens to fine a family for running its business according to its beliefs. It's not right. I know people will say we ought to follow the rules; that it's the same for everybody. But that's not true. The government has exempted thousands of companies from this mandate, for reasons of convenience or cost. But it won't exempt them for reasons of religious belief.


So, Hobby Lobby and my family are forced to make a choice. With great reluctance, we filed a lawsuit today, represented by the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, asking a federal court to stop this mandate before it hurts our business. We don't like to go running into court, but we no longer have a choice. We believe people are more important than the bottom line and that honoring God is more important than turning a profit.

My family has lived the American dream. We want to continue growing our company and providing great jobs for thousands of employees, but the government is going to make that much more difficult. The government is forcing us to choose between following our faith and following the law. I say that's a choice no American and no American business should have to make.
The government cannot force you to follow laws that go against your fundamental religious belief. They have exempted thousands of companies but will not except Christian organizations including the Catholic church.

Since you will not see this covered in any of the liberal media, pass this on to all your contacts.

 
Sincerely,
David Green, CEO and Founder of Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.

Sunday, June 24, 2012

The Road to Hell in Headlines


It’s Sunday Morning and I’m sitting at my computer contemplating what I have been reading from around the web this morning. I have become aware of the numbness in my reaction to certain headlines as I try to absorb some relevance to what’s going on around me in the world and how it affects my life.

Sixth Youth Charged in Delivery Driver's Murder

Ill. Supreme Court: Sex With 17-Year-Old Was Legal, Pictures Were Not

Pet Piranha Bites Off Toddler's Fingertip

All of these headlines made me feel sad, but they also made me curious as to how a country like the USA has allowed our society to become so narcissistic, unrestrained and empty.  Why will gangs murder for $48 dollars and some dim sung?. Why are pictures more important than the soul of a 17 year old? Why do people keep exotic pets that mean more to them than their children.

But the story that struck me as most odd and disturbing was:
*Eye For An Eye, Hair For Hair? Judge Orders Price Woman
 To Cut Off Daughter's Ponytail In Court
Teen had helped cut hair of 3-year-old girl she met at McDonald's

A troubled 14 year old girl and her 11 year old girl friend sat in a booth at McDonald's plotting an attack on a three year old girl they had started talking to and playing with. The two perpetrators first asked a McDonald's employee if they could borrow a pair of scissors. They were told no. They then walked across the street and bought a pair of scissors at a Dollar Store. They went back to the McDonald's and proceeded to cut the  little girl’s hair off to little to chin level before the attack was stopped. The toddler had soft wavy hair the fell to the middle of her back and had never been cut according to her mother. The older girls were arrested.

At their trial, the older of the two girls was sentenced to serve 30 days in detention, pay restitution to her victims and serve 276 hours of community service. But the Judge told the girl’s mother he would cut the punishment in half if she would cut her daughter’s ponytail off, right in the courtroom, at the request of the 3 year old mother. The older girl's mother accepted the off, but now has second thoughts. The 11 year old had already had had her hair cut but was allowed to have it done in a beauty salon.

The older girls mother has since file a complaint against the Judge stating she wished she hadn’t taken the Judges offer, stating: "I guess I should have went into the courtroom knowing my rights, because I felt very intimidated," adding "An eye for an eye, that's not how you teach kids right from wrong.". He daughter had also been charged in another crime of making obscene and threatening phone call, with threats of rape and mutilation, to a teen in another state. Some of the calls were recorded.

I found this article to be disturbing on many levels. Obviously the Judge was wiser than the mother who seems to have had no religious instruction at all on how to raise her daughter to be a moral, kind, self-respecting person. And now she’s willing to go back to court to show her daughter what the Judge did was wrong which means what her daughter did was right.

All of theses headlines and stories have one thing in common; we now know we live in a secular world, where things like kindness, morality and self-control are all long ago norms, replaced by selfishness, greed, laziness and mockery of a sane society.

The Bible was removed from our schools, replaced by moral relativism. Do what feels good not what’s morally right. It’s so obvious. Unfortunately, society is blinded to the truth. It rushes down the path of least resistance; the path that leads to Hell.
http://www.ksl.com/?nid=148&sid=20946125


Tuesday, May 29, 2012

Romney's Hidden Victory

To say Mitt Romney's securing the Republican Presidential nomination is underwhelming to the Press is an understatement. Headlines as of 5/29, at 9:43 pm:





Seems strange for the man who will probably
be our President come November!

Saturday, December 17, 2011

Obama, Made to Dictate

Barak Hussein Obama's work, for this task, started years before he came to the Presidency. He was born, maybe as American or maybe not, to free-thinkers in the 1960's. It was a time of heated protest against an unpopular war and the great civil rights struggles that moved American culture to a socially more just society. It was a time of free love and psychedelic drugs and great upheaval. It was a time that changed America from a wholesome, apple pie society to the bong, thong and song cultural drift it now experiences. Barack Obama was a born dictator.

His mother, S. Ann Dunham Sorento, was a Kansas born girl, uprooted frequently by her restless Father who came to live in Hawaii. She hungered for romance and excitement in her life. She was rebellious of the vestments of that time and she did the unthinkable, she married out of her race. This was no small affront to a society who was dealing with the new paradigm of a more tolerant attitude toward social issues. She married the most controversial figure she could find, a married, foreign, muslin man who was black. Someone that could express her disdain of proper society. She seems to have passed this gene onto her son.

He had a childhood that could best be described as Bohemian. Uprooted from the very beginning by the abandonment of his father and the restlessness of his mother he had an unconventional childhood. His Mother seemed to gravitate toward Muslim men. Her second husband, another Muslim, moved his new family from Hawaii to Indonesia. A young Obama attended both secular and Muslim schools there until his mother once again uprooted her children, Barak and half-sister, Maya, and moved them back to Hawaii. To get a better understanding of Obama you need only take a look at his mother's life. This from a 2008 Times magazine article:
"She cried a lot," says her daughter Maya Soetoro-Ng, "if she saw animals being treated cruelly or children in the news or a sad movie—or if she felt like she wasn't being understood in a conversation." And yet she was fearless, says Soetoro-Ng. "She was very capable. She went out on the back of a motorcycle and did rigorous fieldwork. Her research was responsible and penetrating. She saw the heart of a problem, and she knew whom to hold accountable."
It describes Obama perfectly, and explains some of his recent choices. Empathy and accountability. His choice of Sonia Sotomayor for the Supreme Court is almost Oedipal. His mother's empathy and accountability are firmly implanted in this woman who appears to have similar personality traits as Obama;s mother and if you squint your eyes really hard, even looks a little like Obama's mother.

Some of the greatest influences in Obama's early life were Leftist and Marxist. His early friendships and activities were that of a young man with an identity crisis. One of his strongest influences as a young man in Hawaii was a Communist, a poet, and an admitted pedophile, Frank Marshall Davis. Barak's white Grandfather introduced his grandson to Davis, who was black, when he[Barak] was 10 years old. Barak grew to think of Davis as a Father figure and mentor.

In Chicago, Obama worked for Leftest Organizations and had Leftest friends. Bill Ayers a 1960's radical and Bernadine Dorn were friends and neighbors. Ayers and Obama worked and raised money for the same Foundation. Father Flager and Rev. Jeriahmia Wright, were personal heroes of Obama

Obviously, Barak Hussein Obama is a Muslim at heart. No other explanation could explain his body language and speech since his entry into public life. Before he was elected he shunned all things Muslim. He wouldn't use his middle name. He banned two Muslim women from the stage at a campaign event in Detroit because the were wearing hijabs, Muslim headscarves. He later denied it was his fault because his staff had assigned their seat to someone else.

He was paranoid about being linked to the Muslim world given most Americans skepticism since 911. He made a Freudian slip in an September 8, 2008 interview with George Stephanopolos of ABC. The video has now disappeared from YouTube replaced with this notice: This is from the transcript of that interview:

"MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: And John McCain said the same thing about questioning your faith.
SEN. OBAMA: And what was the first thing the McCain campaign went out and did? They said, look, these liberal blogs that support Obama are out there attacking Governor Palin. Let's not play games. What I was suggesting - you're absolutely right that John McCain has not talked about my Muslim faith, and you're absolutely right that that has not come -

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS:
Your Christian faith.

SEN. OBAMA: My Christian faith - well, what I'm saying is -
MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: Connections, right.

SEN. OBAMA: - that he hasn't suggested that I'm a Muslim, and I think that his campaign upper echelons haven't either. What I think is fair to say is that coming out of the Republican camp, there have been efforts to suggest that perhaps I'm not what who I say I am when it comes to my faith, something which I find deeply offensive, and that has been going on for a pretty long time."

He gave a speech in 2006 that mocked Christians and Jews by mocking the old and new testaments of the Bible. It was in that speech that he first uttered "America is no longer a Christian nation". This phrase is often taken out of context, because in it he mentions other religions that are part of America, Jews, Muslims, Buddhists. This may have been an acceptable comment except he has kept repeating it. He seems to, at every turn, ridicule Christianity and Judaism. In Turkey he again said "America is no longer a Christian nation". He was trying to make a connection between the two countries, Turkey and America, as secular nations.


Who can forget the bow to the Saudi King...

In Cario, Egypt Obama made his pilgrimage to his true belief and spoke these words:
“I have known Islam on three continents before coming to the region where it was first revealed. That experience guides my conviction that partnership between America and Islam must be based on what Islam is, not what it isn’t. And I consider it part of my responsibility as president of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear.”



On French television he nuanced his remarks about America and Muslims by saying:
"Now, the flip side is I think that the United States and the West generally, we have to educate ourselves more effectively on Islam. And one of the points I want to make is, is that if you actually took the number of Muslims Americans, we’d be one of the largest Muslim countries in the world. And so there’s got to be a better dialogue and a better understanding between the two peoples."
For all his sage understanding he clearly is revealing his soul. He is, no matter what his words say, a Muslim, an Islamist and possibly a jihadist in the way he is changing America.

When any organism is attacked from a foreign body it defends itself. Most of the President's true ideas are foreign to a great many Americans. He has talked like a Moderate and has preformed as something very different. Almost all of his "change" has been 180 degrees from where most Americans live. Obama loves to dictate what America should be; anything but American.

Monday, October 31, 2011

An Open Letter to City Officials Who Have Allowed OWS to Gain a Foothold in Their Communities…

To NYC Mayor Bloomberg and
Other Mayors hosting OWS:


What the hell are you thinking?
As this OWS(Occupy Wall Street) virus spreads, why are you allowing public and private property to be violated in the false notion of societal victimization and free speech? Are you so afraid that these little freaks constitutional “rights” are being violated at the expense of public safety and sanity, that you feel you have to kowtow to their demands? How long will your citizens allow you to babysit these childish thugs?

These people and groups want to so overwhelm your police, jails, courts and all city amenities, to the point of collapse. This is not free speech! This is not “the right of redress”; this is a Revolution and apparently you fail to foresee the dangers that lye ahead as these groups set up a “government” within your local governments and within the United States?

The OWS will not obey any law that sane people in a civil society have created for the greater good and protection of their city’s inhabitants. They are outlaws, beggars, misfits, and worse; criminals and mentally ill sociopaths who are preying on one and other, as well as your communities at large.

They are Community Organizers in the worst vein of the Arab Spring demonstrators. They are: Communist, Leftists, Fascists, Skinheads, Nazis, and every form of Left-wing Agitator who intend to help this Administration complete their final “transformation” of America! They are the enemy of everything they say they stand for in the grandiose outline of Saul Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals”; and Cloward and Piven.

Money, clothing, tents and food are pouring into  these groups’ encampments in your cities while your Mayors and other public officials are trying to “accommodate” these groups by allowing the Protestors to destroy public and private spaces, commit lewd acts and turn them into virtual cesspools.

It time for you to do your duty as elected city officials of all the people of your communities and not let these false egalitarians destroy your citizen’s rights to a safe and protected environment without the violence and unclean conditions that these demurrers are creating. Their agenda is blurred by noble sounding causes that are just props for their illegal notions under civil U.S. Code.

From Cornell University Law School, Legal Information Institute:
U.S. Code: § 2385. Advocating overthrow of Government.
TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 115 > § 2385
Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States or the government of any State, Territory, District or Possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein, by force or violence, or by the assassination of any officer of any such government; or

Whoever, with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of any such government, prints, publishes, edits, issues, circulates, sells, distributes, or publicly displays any written or printed matter advocating, advising, or teaching the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying any government in the United States by force or violence, or attempts to do so; or

Whoever organizes or helps or attempts to organize any society, group, or assembly of persons who teach, advocate, or encourage the overthrow or destruction of any such government by force or violence; or becomes or is a member of, or affiliates with, any such society, group, or assembly of persons, knowing the purposes thereof—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.

If two or more persons conspire to commit any offense named in this section, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.

As used in this section, the terms “organizes” and “organize”, with respect to any society, group, or assembly of persons, include the recruiting of new members, the forming of new units, and the regrouping or expansion of existing clubs, classes, and other units of such society, group, or assembly of persons.

My question to the cities hosting the OWS Movement: Why aren’t you upholding the Law? Do the job your constituents elected you to do! STOP the unlawful overthrow of the United States Constitution; NOW!

EVICT OWS NOW!

Wednesday, March 23, 2011

Obama: the Man in the Mirror...President or Something Else?

Do I contradict myself?
Very well then I contradict myself,
(I am large, I contain multitudes.)
Walt Whitman, "Song of Myself" US poet (1819 - 1892)
Metaphors are an apt tool to use when trying to define a complex subject. Barack Hussein Obama is as complex a subject as it gets in politics. He spent, or some suggest, misspent his youth avoiding defining himself. He hides his history with a vigor that a master criminal would envy. He hides his motives even deeper. Alas, this has never seemed more true than with his foreign policy adventures since becoming President. I wonder who he sees when he looks in the mirror? A President? A savior of minorities around the world? Or as a Dictator?

For the past weeks President Obama has made it crystal clear that he shouldn't be the Commander-in-Chief of the United States Armed Forces in a time of war. He has been as transparent as mud. He has not even shown the faintest hint of being a competent leader as he and his Administration have played the most confusing game of Brinkmanship with the Middle-East's democracy[sic] movements; approving one day and objecting the next.

He is driving both the far-left and far-right into furious fits of rebuke as his in-decisions and curious in-actions compound upon themselves. President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and have appeared on opposite sides of policy at times since the “pro-democracy” protests started to consume the Middle-East. We were either met with confusion, contradiction or downright silence. 

The pro-democracy protests started in Tunisia in December of 2010 as a young student protester set himself on fire, purportedly in protest of Tunisia's ruling family's accumulation of wealth, while leaving the youth of Tunisia and its college graduates jobless. It became the Facebook and Twitter Revolution as pro-democracy students and activists posted the chronology of events on the internet for all to see. The fuse had been lit. On January 14th, 2011, after weeks of silence, Obama's issued his first official statement on the crisis:
“The United States stands with the entire international community in bearing witness to this brave and determined struggle for the universal rights that we must all uphold, and we will long remember the images of the Tunisian people seeking to make their voices heard. I urge all parties to maintain calm and avoid violence, and call on the Tunisian government to respect human rights, and to hold free and fair elections in the near future that reflect the true will and aspirations of the Tunisian people.” 

By the 19th of January President Obama was assuring Egypt's Hosni Mubarak that he had his back. On February 1, it is reported by Arron Klein at WorldNetDaily.com that a high U.S. Embassy official was meeting with the Muslim Brotherhood to discuss Egypt's future after Mubarak “falls”. On February 1st, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was calling for an “orderly transition of power” to democracy.

That same day Mubarak announced he would not run for re-election in the fall, Obama issued a statement that the transition must start now. On February 10th, Mubarak raised the hopes of the demonstrators with a “big announcement”. Protesters and governments across the world thought this was his resignation announcement. He told the multitude of cheering students, activists and countless people caught up in the revolutionary reverie that he wouldn't leave until September. Fierce riots broke out and the next morning, on February 11th, Mubarak finally announced his resignation.

After maintaining an eerie silence on Libyan leader Muammar el-Qaddafi's assault on his own people in the aftermath of the Tunisian and Egyptian uprising, Obama finally made a statement on February 23rd about Libya but never mentions Qaddafi by name. On March 17th the UN Security Council issues its order for a no-fly zone between Libya's revolutionaries and Qaddafi's military forces. President Obama commits planes, ships and munitions to another middle-eastern "conflict" and says we'll be out of Libya soon or maybe not; it depends what time of the week it is.
 
Qaddafi prefaced a letter to President Obama on March 19, 2011, as reported by the Times of India:
"To our son, his excellency, Mr Barack Hussein Obama. I have said to you before, that even if Libya and the United Sates of America enter into a war, god forbid, you will always remain a son. Your picture will not be changed."

I suppose this means Obama will still be welcome among the Libyan elite if they survive this fiasco and there is every indication that both Obama and Qaddafi will survive.


The Obama Administration's collusion on the uprisings in the Middle-East are also reported to have begun as early as 2008. It was reported in the January 28th, 2011 issue of the London Telegraph that the U.S. Embassy in Cairo assisted a young dissident in attending a U.S.sponsored summit-for-activists in New York City in 2008. The same dissident was part of the Egyptian demonstrations in January, 2011.

During the Egyptian riots International Unions and many communist organizations participated in the riots. Disturbingly, planners included the U.S. State Department sponsored Alliance for Youth Movements. They worked together to stir up the demonstrators across the Middle-East.  The AYA movement is a world wide cabal that involves pro-democracy movements across the world: Anti-FARC in South America, pro-democracy activists in China, activists in most middle-eastern countries including the April 6th Youth Movement. The State Department partnered with private sector companies such as: Facebook, Google, Pepsi, MTV, AT&T, Howcast, Access 360 Media and the Columbia University Law School among others to promote techniques that activist could use to protest their oppressors under the guise of helping youth organize. The current protests are not spontaneous demonstrations or movements.They have been planning these insurrections since 2008 and probably before.

What does Obama actually see in the mirror these days? Does he have the same malady that Alice in Wonderland Land had after she went through the looking glass; everything looked backwards? Is he just hiding his true identity; that of a soft dictator, the face behind a movement. This doesn't bode well for his leadership in the United States. How does he account for his lack of decisiveness? He is the master of contradiction and unfortunately the executor of our fate..