Saturday, December 17, 2011

Obama, Made to Dictate

Barak Hussein Obama's work, for this task, started years before he came to the Presidency. He was born, maybe as American or maybe not, to free-thinkers in the 1960's. It was a time of heated protest against an unpopular war and the great civil rights struggles that moved American culture to a socially more just society. It was a time of free love and psychedelic drugs and great upheaval. It was a time that changed America from a wholesome, apple pie society to the bong, thong and song cultural drift it now experiences. Barack Obama was a born dictator.

His mother, S. Ann Dunham Sorento, was a Kansas born girl, uprooted frequently by her restless Father who came to live in Hawaii. She hungered for romance and excitement in her life. She was rebellious of the vestments of that time and she did the unthinkable, she married out of her race. This was no small affront to a society who was dealing with the new paradigm of a more tolerant attitude toward social issues. She married the most controversial figure she could find, a married, foreign, muslin man who was black. Someone that could express her disdain of proper society. She seems to have passed this gene onto her son.

He had a childhood that could best be described as Bohemian. Uprooted from the very beginning by the abandonment of his father and the restlessness of his mother he had an unconventional childhood. His Mother seemed to gravitate toward Muslim men. Her second husband, another Muslim, moved his new family from Hawaii to Indonesia. A young Obama attended both secular and Muslim schools there until his mother once again uprooted her children, Barak and half-sister, Maya, and moved them back to Hawaii. To get a better understanding of Obama you need only take a look at his mother's life. This from a 2008 Times magazine article:
"She cried a lot," says her daughter Maya Soetoro-Ng, "if she saw animals being treated cruelly or children in the news or a sad movie—or if she felt like she wasn't being understood in a conversation." And yet she was fearless, says Soetoro-Ng. "She was very capable. She went out on the back of a motorcycle and did rigorous fieldwork. Her research was responsible and penetrating. She saw the heart of a problem, and she knew whom to hold accountable."
It describes Obama perfectly, and explains some of his recent choices. Empathy and accountability. His choice of Sonia Sotomayor for the Supreme Court is almost Oedipal. His mother's empathy and accountability are firmly implanted in this woman who appears to have similar personality traits as Obama;s mother and if you squint your eyes really hard, even looks a little like Obama's mother.

Some of the greatest influences in Obama's early life were Leftist and Marxist. His early friendships and activities were that of a young man with an identity crisis. One of his strongest influences as a young man in Hawaii was a Communist, a poet, and an admitted pedophile, Frank Marshall Davis. Barak's white Grandfather introduced his grandson to Davis, who was black, when he[Barak] was 10 years old. Barak grew to think of Davis as a Father figure and mentor.

In Chicago, Obama worked for Leftest Organizations and had Leftest friends. Bill Ayers a 1960's radical and Bernadine Dorn were friends and neighbors. Ayers and Obama worked and raised money for the same Foundation. Father Flager and Rev. Jeriahmia Wright, were personal heroes of Obama

Obviously, Barak Hussein Obama is a Muslim at heart. No other explanation could explain his body language and speech since his entry into public life. Before he was elected he shunned all things Muslim. He wouldn't use his middle name. He banned two Muslim women from the stage at a campaign event in Detroit because the were wearing hijabs, Muslim headscarves. He later denied it was his fault because his staff had assigned their seat to someone else.

He was paranoid about being linked to the Muslim world given most Americans skepticism since 911. He made a Freudian slip in an September 8, 2008 interview with George Stephanopolos of ABC. The video has now disappeared from YouTube replaced with this notice: This is from the transcript of that interview:

"MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: And John McCain said the same thing about questioning your faith.
SEN. OBAMA: And what was the first thing the McCain campaign went out and did? They said, look, these liberal blogs that support Obama are out there attacking Governor Palin. Let's not play games. What I was suggesting - you're absolutely right that John McCain has not talked about my Muslim faith, and you're absolutely right that that has not come -

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS:
Your Christian faith.

SEN. OBAMA: My Christian faith - well, what I'm saying is -
MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: Connections, right.

SEN. OBAMA: - that he hasn't suggested that I'm a Muslim, and I think that his campaign upper echelons haven't either. What I think is fair to say is that coming out of the Republican camp, there have been efforts to suggest that perhaps I'm not what who I say I am when it comes to my faith, something which I find deeply offensive, and that has been going on for a pretty long time."

He gave a speech in 2006 that mocked Christians and Jews by mocking the old and new testaments of the Bible. It was in that speech that he first uttered "America is no longer a Christian nation". This phrase is often taken out of context, because in it he mentions other religions that are part of America, Jews, Muslims, Buddhists. This may have been an acceptable comment except he has kept repeating it. He seems to, at every turn, ridicule Christianity and Judaism. In Turkey he again said "America is no longer a Christian nation". He was trying to make a connection between the two countries, Turkey and America, as secular nations.


Who can forget the bow to the Saudi King...

In Cario, Egypt Obama made his pilgrimage to his true belief and spoke these words:
“I have known Islam on three continents before coming to the region where it was first revealed. That experience guides my conviction that partnership between America and Islam must be based on what Islam is, not what it isn’t. And I consider it part of my responsibility as president of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear.”



On French television he nuanced his remarks about America and Muslims by saying:
"Now, the flip side is I think that the United States and the West generally, we have to educate ourselves more effectively on Islam. And one of the points I want to make is, is that if you actually took the number of Muslims Americans, we’d be one of the largest Muslim countries in the world. And so there’s got to be a better dialogue and a better understanding between the two peoples."
For all his sage understanding he clearly is revealing his soul. He is, no matter what his words say, a Muslim, an Islamist and possibly a jihadist in the way he is changing America.

When any organism is attacked from a foreign body it defends itself. Most of the President's true ideas are foreign to a great many Americans. He has talked like a Moderate and has preformed as something very different. Almost all of his "change" has been 180 degrees from where most Americans live. Obama loves to dictate what America should be; anything but American.

Monday, October 31, 2011

An Open Letter to City Officials Who Have Allowed OWS to Gain a Foothold in Their Communities…

To NYC Mayor Bloomberg and
Other Mayors hosting OWS:


What the hell are you thinking?
As this OWS(Occupy Wall Street) virus spreads, why are you allowing public and private property to be violated in the false notion of societal victimization and free speech? Are you so afraid that these little freaks constitutional “rights” are being violated at the expense of public safety and sanity, that you feel you have to kowtow to their demands? How long will your citizens allow you to babysit these childish thugs?

These people and groups want to so overwhelm your police, jails, courts and all city amenities, to the point of collapse. This is not free speech! This is not “the right of redress”; this is a Revolution and apparently you fail to foresee the dangers that lye ahead as these groups set up a “government” within your local governments and within the United States?

The OWS will not obey any law that sane people in a civil society have created for the greater good and protection of their city’s inhabitants. They are outlaws, beggars, misfits, and worse; criminals and mentally ill sociopaths who are preying on one and other, as well as your communities at large.

They are Community Organizers in the worst vein of the Arab Spring demonstrators. They are: Communist, Leftists, Fascists, Skinheads, Nazis, and every form of Left-wing Agitator who intend to help this Administration complete their final “transformation” of America! They are the enemy of everything they say they stand for in the grandiose outline of Saul Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals”; and Cloward and Piven.

Money, clothing, tents and food are pouring into  these groups’ encampments in your cities while your Mayors and other public officials are trying to “accommodate” these groups by allowing the Protestors to destroy public and private spaces, commit lewd acts and turn them into virtual cesspools.

It time for you to do your duty as elected city officials of all the people of your communities and not let these false egalitarians destroy your citizen’s rights to a safe and protected environment without the violence and unclean conditions that these demurrers are creating. Their agenda is blurred by noble sounding causes that are just props for their illegal notions under civil U.S. Code.

From Cornell University Law School, Legal Information Institute:
U.S. Code: § 2385. Advocating overthrow of Government.
TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 115 > § 2385
Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States or the government of any State, Territory, District or Possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein, by force or violence, or by the assassination of any officer of any such government; or

Whoever, with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of any such government, prints, publishes, edits, issues, circulates, sells, distributes, or publicly displays any written or printed matter advocating, advising, or teaching the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying any government in the United States by force or violence, or attempts to do so; or

Whoever organizes or helps or attempts to organize any society, group, or assembly of persons who teach, advocate, or encourage the overthrow or destruction of any such government by force or violence; or becomes or is a member of, or affiliates with, any such society, group, or assembly of persons, knowing the purposes thereof—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.

If two or more persons conspire to commit any offense named in this section, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.

As used in this section, the terms “organizes” and “organize”, with respect to any society, group, or assembly of persons, include the recruiting of new members, the forming of new units, and the regrouping or expansion of existing clubs, classes, and other units of such society, group, or assembly of persons.

My question to the cities hosting the OWS Movement: Why aren’t you upholding the Law? Do the job your constituents elected you to do! STOP the unlawful overthrow of the United States Constitution; NOW!

EVICT OWS NOW!

Wednesday, March 23, 2011

Obama: the Man in the Mirror...President or Something Else?

Do I contradict myself?
Very well then I contradict myself,
(I am large, I contain multitudes.)
Walt Whitman, "Song of Myself" US poet (1819 - 1892)
Metaphors are an apt tool to use when trying to define a complex subject. Barack Hussein Obama is as complex a subject as it gets in politics. He spent, or some suggest, misspent his youth avoiding defining himself. He hides his history with a vigor that a master criminal would envy. He hides his motives even deeper. Alas, this has never seemed more true than with his foreign policy adventures since becoming President. I wonder who he sees when he looks in the mirror? A President? A savior of minorities around the world? Or as a Dictator?

For the past weeks President Obama has made it crystal clear that he shouldn't be the Commander-in-Chief of the United States Armed Forces in a time of war. He has been as transparent as mud. He has not even shown the faintest hint of being a competent leader as he and his Administration have played the most confusing game of Brinkmanship with the Middle-East's democracy[sic] movements; approving one day and objecting the next.

He is driving both the far-left and far-right into furious fits of rebuke as his in-decisions and curious in-actions compound upon themselves. President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and have appeared on opposite sides of policy at times since the “pro-democracy” protests started to consume the Middle-East. We were either met with confusion, contradiction or downright silence. 

The pro-democracy protests started in Tunisia in December of 2010 as a young student protester set himself on fire, purportedly in protest of Tunisia's ruling family's accumulation of wealth, while leaving the youth of Tunisia and its college graduates jobless. It became the Facebook and Twitter Revolution as pro-democracy students and activists posted the chronology of events on the internet for all to see. The fuse had been lit. On January 14th, 2011, after weeks of silence, Obama's issued his first official statement on the crisis:
“The United States stands with the entire international community in bearing witness to this brave and determined struggle for the universal rights that we must all uphold, and we will long remember the images of the Tunisian people seeking to make their voices heard. I urge all parties to maintain calm and avoid violence, and call on the Tunisian government to respect human rights, and to hold free and fair elections in the near future that reflect the true will and aspirations of the Tunisian people.” 

By the 19th of January President Obama was assuring Egypt's Hosni Mubarak that he had his back. On February 1, it is reported by Arron Klein at WorldNetDaily.com that a high U.S. Embassy official was meeting with the Muslim Brotherhood to discuss Egypt's future after Mubarak “falls”. On February 1st, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was calling for an “orderly transition of power” to democracy.

That same day Mubarak announced he would not run for re-election in the fall, Obama issued a statement that the transition must start now. On February 10th, Mubarak raised the hopes of the demonstrators with a “big announcement”. Protesters and governments across the world thought this was his resignation announcement. He told the multitude of cheering students, activists and countless people caught up in the revolutionary reverie that he wouldn't leave until September. Fierce riots broke out and the next morning, on February 11th, Mubarak finally announced his resignation.

After maintaining an eerie silence on Libyan leader Muammar el-Qaddafi's assault on his own people in the aftermath of the Tunisian and Egyptian uprising, Obama finally made a statement on February 23rd about Libya but never mentions Qaddafi by name. On March 17th the UN Security Council issues its order for a no-fly zone between Libya's revolutionaries and Qaddafi's military forces. President Obama commits planes, ships and munitions to another middle-eastern "conflict" and says we'll be out of Libya soon or maybe not; it depends what time of the week it is.
 
Qaddafi prefaced a letter to President Obama on March 19, 2011, as reported by the Times of India:
"To our son, his excellency, Mr Barack Hussein Obama. I have said to you before, that even if Libya and the United Sates of America enter into a war, god forbid, you will always remain a son. Your picture will not be changed."

I suppose this means Obama will still be welcome among the Libyan elite if they survive this fiasco and there is every indication that both Obama and Qaddafi will survive.


The Obama Administration's collusion on the uprisings in the Middle-East are also reported to have begun as early as 2008. It was reported in the January 28th, 2011 issue of the London Telegraph that the U.S. Embassy in Cairo assisted a young dissident in attending a U.S.sponsored summit-for-activists in New York City in 2008. The same dissident was part of the Egyptian demonstrations in January, 2011.

During the Egyptian riots International Unions and many communist organizations participated in the riots. Disturbingly, planners included the U.S. State Department sponsored Alliance for Youth Movements. They worked together to stir up the demonstrators across the Middle-East.  The AYA movement is a world wide cabal that involves pro-democracy movements across the world: Anti-FARC in South America, pro-democracy activists in China, activists in most middle-eastern countries including the April 6th Youth Movement. The State Department partnered with private sector companies such as: Facebook, Google, Pepsi, MTV, AT&T, Howcast, Access 360 Media and the Columbia University Law School among others to promote techniques that activist could use to protest their oppressors under the guise of helping youth organize. The current protests are not spontaneous demonstrations or movements.They have been planning these insurrections since 2008 and probably before.

What does Obama actually see in the mirror these days? Does he have the same malady that Alice in Wonderland Land had after she went through the looking glass; everything looked backwards? Is he just hiding his true identity; that of a soft dictator, the face behind a movement. This doesn't bode well for his leadership in the United States. How does he account for his lack of decisiveness? He is the master of contradiction and unfortunately the executor of our fate..

Sunday, February 6, 2011

Not So Strange Bedfellows...

Code Pink, Wikileaks, Julian Assange, Hiliary Clinton and Barack Obama

As I've read the headlines on Drudge this week I've had have to ponder how much of the turmoil the world finds itself in can be blamed on the U.S. through its blundering brand of so called foreign policy under the Obama Administration? Leftist politics have always made for a chaotic environment and they haven't missed any opportunity to exploit a crisis, whether foreign or domestic.

...and the beat goes on, Code Pink this week sent a flash message to its members to raise at least $5,000 to help support the pro-democracy demonstrators in Egypt. What was the money supporting? Bottled water or food for the demonstrators? No,something far more pertinent to Medea Benjamin, co-founder of the anti-war group, Code Pink. It was for flowers. Yes, I said flowers.

In an attempt for the self-hating Jewish American Princess, (Susie) Medea Benjamin to recreate the iconic Bernie Boston 1960's war protest photo of demonstrator's placing flowers in the barrel of a gun, the appeal went out. Funny thing is the weapon of choice for the demonstrators in Egypt and Tunisia has been rocks, stones and Molotov Cocktails.

The appeal for funds is from the same organization that last weekend called for the lynching of Supreme Court Justice Thomas and his wife and sending Justice Samuel Alito back to Italy at an anti-capitalist rally against the Wichita, KS based company Koch Industries Inc. Koch's biggest transgression i.e: donating money to anyone other than Barack Obama. The rally also featured “blue ribbon” panelist Van Jones who continued his lunatic progressive spewing of “hate the right” rhetoric.

Wikileaks has irrupted with its own insolent brand of promoting world peace by releasing ever more damaging documents on purported U.S. misdeeds. This week's trope was that the Obama Administration has agreed to release to the Russians closely held secrets on Great Britain's nuclear deterrents. The Obama obsession of damaging the English Empire rings of the same hateful thread of revenge against his ancestor's alleged tormentors as did his first acts of attempting to embarrass the British Empire i.e: returning the Churchill bust from the Oval Office and touching the Queen at their first meeting. Only this is a more serious assault on British security.

Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton's State Department were caught off guard by the events of the past weeks in Egypt. They may go down in history as the two individuals who so severely damaged U.S prestige and influence throughout the Middle-east, Africa and Europe that it could take decades to repair, if its possible at all. Admitting errors is one thing but issuing a flood of contradictory statements about the U.S. position on the problems in Egypt and throughout the middle-east has seemed more than a little bi-polar.

The Administartion's views have ranged from Mubarak must leave immediately to urging caution and allowing Mubarak to stay until the September elections and everything in between. They have supported virtually all sides on this issue, including the Muslim Brotherhood who have been described by the administration both as saviors and terrorist. One has to ask if this is a deliberate decision by the Obama Administration to ally with the Muslim Brotherhood without appearing to.

Obama's modus operandi has always been to win by destroying his enemies whether in politics or foreign policy. Its a good bet that Obama considers Israel “the problem” in the middle-east situation just as he thought of Great Britain as the enemy of Kenya when he was growing up. He heard the tale of his Grandfather being tortured by the Brits in the first Mau Mau Uprising in 1949 Africa and it stuck in his apocryphal memory and formed the biased policies he seems to be carrying out today.

Code Pink, Wikileaks, Julian Assange, Hiliary Clinton and Barack Obama all seem to be working from the same script. Destroy the United State's credibility and the State of Israel at any cost. See to it that the Palestinians and middle-eastern despots are placated, elevated and rewarded.

In an ever more dangerous world Israel is being surrounded by enemies, old and new. This threatens to destabilize more than just the middle-east. It only took the murder of one Austrian archduke to start the first World War. If the dark forces unleashed in Tunisia and Egypt are allowed to fester and Israel is attacked it could be the start of something no one wants to think about. We need to pray that cooler heads will prevail in these matters and that somewhere in the world we can find one, true, statesman; if they even still exist.

Tuesday, January 11, 2011

Left-wing Bias and the Facts

This last weekends news has been an eyeopener for many Americans. Left-wing bias and lunacy has gone viral on mainstream television and the internet. Many Americans that had been reluctant to embrace the Tea Party movement are now seeing first hand how rabid and flawed left-wing bias is.

The shooting of a sitting U.S. Congresswoman and the murder of a federal judge as well as the other victims, both dead and alive, have brought to the surface the Left's most sought after restrictions to personal freedoms in modern times, gun control, talk radio control, internet control and the destruction of Fox News, Sarah Palin, Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck.

Their arguments have met a lot of resistance from the right-wing and even mainstream Americans as the left has spewed its malevolent, hate-filled rhetoric. The nations airwaves are filled with blame for everyone on the right side of any issue but not the person who is allegedly responsible for this heinous act. The Left has been short on facts and long on talking-points. Here are just a few commonsense facts that the left-wing loons may have overlooked in their rush to judgment and desire to denigrate every ring-wing thought and smear every right-wing personality and politician in the process.

The United States of America is the most heavily citizen armed society in the world; and it is the freest. The countries that are the most authoritarian are places where their citizens have no rights, no guns and no freedoms as Americans know through their Bill-of-Rights. If the guns owned by Americans were distributed evenly inside our borders, nine out of every 10 Americans would own a legal weapon.

It took only one legally owned, semi-automatic weapon in the hands of one mentally disturbed man to extinguish 6 lives and change the lives of 13 more, forever. There are laws on the books in Arizona that should have prevented this man from purchasing the gun and ammunition in the first place as he was already know to law enforcement, yet he was never placed on any restricted list for the purchase of a weapon or ammunition.

How can guns be the problem in the face of that kind of evidence?

There are more than 2000 talk radio stations carrying some form of talk, 24 hours a day, in America. Free speech and talk radio are the cornerstone of freedom in our Republic in the 21st Century. The free exchange of ideas, political, sports or the wider communities of though are broadcast 24/7 all across the nation without incidents of mass murder because of the subjects being discussed on these programs.

There is NO evidence that the shooter ever listened to any form of talk radio. He was a “metal-head” and listened to demonic, heavy metal music from what the video evidence of him as the grim reaper, burning the American flag, with a heavy-metal soundtrack seemed to suggest.

So how can talk radio or the hosts on these shows be the cause of this man's insane act?

Fox News is the highest rated cable news network on television, pulling more viewers than all other cable news shows combined on most nights. They, unlike their competitors, consistently provide many points-of-view on all sides of whatever issue they are discussing and they don't feature as a headline personal attacks on the host of their competitor's shows. They have to do a lot of defense from the slings and arrows being thrown by the hosts of their cable networks competition such as CNBC, MSN, MSNBC, CNN and Headline News. And again, NO evidence that this self-described Anarchist and accused murderer ever watched television, let alone Fox News.

With so many words spoken across the airwaves in the 24 hour news cycle, how can Fox News be the problem?

As for the individuals the left-wing media apparatus is smearing, none is more hated by their ilk than Sarah Palin. The very fact that she is a woman who has carved out a place in the public arena while still being a wife, an unapologetic mother, an executive and politician gives the liberals fits. She doesn't fit their template of the successful woman.

Sarah is Pro-Life, Pro-Gun, Pro-God and she actually shoots and processes her own fish and game in a state where there are few grocery stores and people really do eat what they kill. She is a person so alien to the left's lifestyle that they can't fathom her presence on the planet let alone imagine her as President. In their view she must be destroyed, lied about, and by whatever means necessary, be prevented from ever being elected to the highest office in the land.

As for Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck and their megaphone of TV and talk radio are an ever present danger to the Left. The Left has been trying for decades to get control of the airwaves through the fairness doctrine or any device which would silence their most hated critics.

How can Sarah, Rush or Glenn be the problem? They aren't.

There is so much blame being bandied about by the Left, it is mind boggling. They can't see the flaws in their machinations let alone be reasonable and use commonsense. I could list all the false statements by the Left's talking heads but it would take far longer than I wish to devote to this article. The Left's own President, Obama, has been guilty of some of the very speech the Left is complaining about. He is now trying to portray a himself as a more sensitive, thoughtful leader; doing and saying all the right things.

This I fear is a deception . A leopard can't so easily change its spots. In the next weeks and months I see him as the manipulator-in-chief who will begin to inflict serious damage on the U.S. Constitution. I hope I'm wrong but this President's history betrays his move to the middle. He is, after all, a committed leftist, a community activist and still trying to bring about the radical transformation of America. I pray that Americans are not fooled by his pretense. But the President is not responsible for this attack on the Congresswoman and the rest of the victims.

The person who pulled the trigger on that legally purchased weapon is ultimately responsible.

Don't let this demented man's insane act be used as an excuse to let this Administration take our freedoms away. Stand up for what you know is right, not right-wing, just right.